Well, we’ve been up all night on this one. PBCS is a bit of a minefield right now. But, very cool to get so much OPSGROUP input on this – about 100 replies. We have straightened out the Rumours vs Facts below, and this is our best shot at the present picture of PBCS.
Don’t take any of it as total fact, but we have redacted the best picture from the various experts in the group (and there are some great people – we should say a big THANK YOU!).
Got corrections? Comments below …
Oh for the days of HF and a dodgy INS accurate to about 6 miles. Anyhow ….
Results after OPSGROUP input – updated March 16th, 2018
These aircraft have Honeywell FMS’s that have the Latency Problem:
- All NZ-2010 Equipped Aircraft – NZ-2010 (NZ6.1)
- Bombardier Global Express/XRS/Global 5000 – IC-810 (NZ6.1)
- Dassault F900C/EX (Primus 2000) – IC-810 (NZ6.1)
- Dassault F900DX/EX/LX (EASy II) – EPIC (NZ7.1.2)
- Dassault F2000DX/EX/LX/S (EASy II) – EPIC (NZ7.1.2)
- Dassault F7X (EASy II) – EPIC (NZ7.1.2)
- Dornier 328-100 Turboprop – NZ (NZ6.2)
- Gulfstream GV – IC-810 (NZ6.1)
- Gulfstream G450 – EPIC (NZ7.1.2)
- Gulfstream G550 – EPIC (NZ7.1.2)
Latest Links:
United States – for N-reg aircraft
- Updated Compliance Guide: https://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_ offices/avs/offices/afx/afs/ afs400/afs470/datacomm/media/ A056_Compliance_Guide.pdf - The Notice for new A056: Curent Notice (being updated with the new deadline of June 30, 2018): https://www.faa.gov/
documentLibrary/media/Notice/ N_8900.446.pdf - AC about Datalink: https://www.faa.gov/
documentLibrary/media/ Advisory_Circular/AC_90-117. pdf - NAARMO PBCS FAQ: https://www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/separation_standards/ rvsm/documents/PBCS/PBCS_FAQ_ 2018_0129_v3.pdf
Canada
Europe
- EASA are not requiring their states to issue an approval, although some are, for example the Swiss CAA have an application form for their ‘HB’ registered aircraft (https://www.bazl.admin.ch/
bazl/en/home/specialists/air- ) to obtain approval.transport/operation/aircraft- companies/complex-aeroplanes/ commercial-flight-operators/ pbcs.html
NAT Region
- Updated NAT Bulletin (March 2nd): https://www.icao.int/
EURNAT/EUR%20and%20NAT% 20Documents/NAT%20Documents/ NAT%20OPS%20Bulletins/NAT% 20OPS%20Bulletin_2018_001_ Rev01.pdf
More on the topic:
- More: July 2019 North Atlantic Update
- More: 2019 North Atlantic changes
- More: First look at NAT changes for 2019
- More: The Impact of Space-Based ADS-B on International Operations
- More: Your top three PBCS questions answered
More reading:
- Latest: Olá Brazil: New Entry Rules for US, Canadian and Australian Citizens
- Latest: Unapproachable Approaches: South Africa’s IFR Crisis
- Latest: Boston Parking Restrictions Are Back
- Safe Airspace: Risk Database
- Weekly Ops Bulletin: Subscribe
- Membership plans: Why join OPSGROUP?
B737 has PBCS. B747 FM would need to upgrade to B747-8 FM and order from Boeing.
FAA has revised the FANS LOA date for Part 91 Operators to Sept 30, 2018 (as of this week) for PBCS. This should be published in about 5 days.
March 29 (commercial operators) and June 30 (Part 91) are EXPIRATION dates for an operator’s current A056 authorization; therefore, without a new OpSpec or LOA, operators will NOT be authorized to conduct CPDLC or ADS-C operations after these dates. Getting a new OpSpec or LOA requires pilot training (see the FAA’s Data Link Communications Compliance Guide) which can be done in house or via the operator’s training provider. Operators should contact their POI or FSDO ASAP to get the OpSpec/LOA process going. Operators should contact their training provider to solve the training part of this issue.
True. No PBCS for all 777 now.
AIMS 2 aircraft will be capable upon installing BP 17B, which will be available 1Q 2019.
Sad …
Boeing saying they wont have PBCS for B777 until Q1 2019 with AIMS-2 block point BP17B.