Each day thousands of aircraft routinely cross the NAT and use airports in Greenland as enroute/ETOPS alternates – mainly BGSF/Sondrestrom and BGBW/Narsarsuaq.
It’s big business for Greenland’s major airports, but over the next few years major changes are coming that will directly impact on the operational use of these airports as NAT alternates.
Here’s the lowdown on what’s changing:
- Opening: BGGH/Nuuk (Nov 2024), BGQO/Qaqortoq (Spring 2026), BGJN/Ilulissat (Fall 2026).
- Changing: BGSF/Sondrestrom possibly downgrading ATC to AFIS (end of 2025).
- Closing: BGBW/Narsarsuaq (likely Spring 2026).
ETOPS Airports…
Before we get stuck into the finer points of what’s changing at each airport, a big question many will have is: “What airports can I use as enroute/ETOPS alternates?”
Answering that is tricky, because it will depend on a number of factors that will be different for each operator – if the airport has a long enough runway for your particular aircraft / the necessary facilities and services / the minimum approach procedure / fire cover / weather minima etc.
But here’s a quick reference table showing what’s changing, and when, which might be helpful:
BGGH/Nuuk
Nuuk’s found on the western edge of Southern Greenland, close to the NAT HLA. It’s Greenland’s capital city but until now, the airport has not been ‘capital-sized’.
Hence why larger aircraft have not considered BGGH/Nuuk as a viable alternate due to its short runway length (3,050’/930m) in addition to poor weather and the mountainous terrain that surrounds it.
But things will soon get easier. A major expansion has been underway since 2019 to replace its aging runway and improve the airport infrastructure to accommodate the wide body airliners of the territory’s flagship carrier who are relocating their hub there.
28 Nov 2024 has been earmarked as its full re-opening – just weeks away. A new runway will now measure 7,200’/2200m. Better yet, ILS approaches will be operating at both ends with much lower minimas. A new terminal building, tower and apron are already in use.
If you have any doubts as to Nuuk’s viability as a well-equipped NAT alternate, it may be reassuring to hear that at least one US legacy carrier will also commence scheduled services to the improved airport from Newark twice a week from mid-next year.
Keep an eye out for an upcoming OPSGROUP briefing on the new and improved Nuuk soon.
BGQO/Qaqortoq
A new airport will be opening in Spring 2026, 35nm away from Narsarsuaq on Greenland’s southern tip.
Right now Qaqortoq is a heliport (operating under a different ICAO code), but will re-open with a 4,921’/1500m runway due to a decision by Greenland’s government a few years back to convert it for fixed wing traffic.
At that length Qaqortoq will likely only be an option for small to medium sized jets, but there is also room for future expansion to 5,905’/1800m – so watch this space in years to come. Word on the street is that it will also be equipped with both LOC and RNP approaches.
BGJN/Ilulissat
A new international airport is under construction which will be equipped with a 7,217’/2200m runway. It’s scheduled to open in Fall 2026 and will replace the existing domestic airport. By in large, it will be equipped with the same equipment as the upgraded airport in Nuuk.
Next up, a look at what’s happening at the existing airports BGSF/Sondrestrom and BGBW/Narsarsuaq…
BGSF/Sondrestrom
The much-improved airport in Nuuk will undoubtedly take a heavy toll on traffic levels at Sondrestrom – in the vicinity of a 90% reduction.
But all is not lost for BGSF as a solid NAT alternate – it will continue to operate, with almost full services available with one notable exception – ATS could be downgraded to an AFIS sometime next year.
The runway (9,186’/2800m) is longer than Nuuk, and the weather much more predictable – it should remain a solid option to consider.
BGBW/Narsarsuaq
The airport is scheduled to close in 2026! 😱
Despite its geographical convenience to NAT traffic, it remains a difficult option. For some, it is considered only in the case of extreme circumstances (such as fire).
The reason for this is predominantly weather, and the non-precision approaches that serve the airport. The runway itself is also short at only 5,905’/1800m.
Reminder – Look out for Surprise Fees
We’ve written about this before, but worth a reminder.
Be careful – if you file BGBW or BGSF as an alternate after hours (overnight 20-11z or anytime on Sundays) you will be charged the better part of $3000 USD for the privilege of keeping standby equipment on watch, and runways clear of snow. Even if you don’t actually divert there.
A little insider advice – advance notice will reduce the cost as it allows for cheaper planning. If you need one outside of normal operating hours, provide at least 24 hours’ notice.
For regular use, operators can also apply directly for a reduction in these rates.
Know more about changes to Greenland Ops?
We’d love to hear from you. You can reach us via news@ops.group
More on the topic:
- More: 2025 North Atlantic Plotting & Planning Chart
- More: NAT Ops: Flying the Blue Spruce Routes
- More: NAT Guide 2025 – My First NAT Flight is Tomorrow
- More: NAT Circle of Entry (2025)
- More: NAT FAQ: No Datalink – Where can we go?
More reading:
- Latest: Dodging Danger: The Three Routes Through the Middle East
- Latest: US Pre-Clearance: How does it work?
- Latest: 2025 North Atlantic Plotting & Planning Chart
- Safe Airspace: Risk Database
- Weekly Ops Bulletin: Subscribe
- Membership plans: Why join OPSGROUP?
Hi Chris,
BGGH is based on AFIS – your paper may lead the reader to understand it has ATC and controlled airspace/control zone – that will not be the case.