{"id":29827,"date":"2026-05-27T03:00:06","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T07:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/?p=29827"},"modified":"2026-05-27T10:39:21","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T14:39:21","slug":"middle-east-airspace-current-operational-picture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/middle-east-airspace-current-operational-picture\/","title":{"rendered":"Middle East Airspace &#8211; Current Operational Picture"},"content":{"rendered":"<h6><strong>Key Points &#8211; May 27 update<\/strong><\/h6>\n<ul>\n<li data-section-id=\"da0cdm\" data-start=\"12\" data-end=\"83\"><strong>Most Gulf FIRs are now open again, but ops are still far from normal.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li data-section-id=\"1q5auhs\" data-start=\"84\" data-end=\"188\"><strong>Main Europe-Asia routings remain south via Egypt-Saudi-Oman\/UAE or north via the Caucasus\/Afghanistan.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li data-section-id=\"103nzta\" data-start=\"189\" data-end=\"265\"><strong>Very little traffic is currently using the old Iran\/Iraq central corridor.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li data-section-id=\"1bmw8ny\" data-start=\"266\" data-end=\"350\"><strong>GPS jamming\/spoofing is now one of the biggest operational issues across the region.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li data-section-id=\"6yojxf\" data-start=\"351\" data-end=\"453\" data-is-last-node=\"\"><strong>ATC congestion and tactical routing procedures remain common, especially around the southern bypass.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-start=\"1102\" data-end=\"1211\">The central Middle East corridor still isn\u2019t really back as a super straightforward Europe-Asia routing option, but most Gulf airspace has now reopened in some form or another.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_30403\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-30403\" class=\"size-large wp-image-30403\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/mideast-airspace-27may26-1024x660.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"660\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/mideast-airspace-27may26-1024x660.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/mideast-airspace-27may26-300x193.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/mideast-airspace-27may26-768x495.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/mideast-airspace-27may26-1536x991.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/mideast-airspace-27may26.jpg 1670w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-30403\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Snapshot of airspace on May 27. Still not a single plane in the sky over Iran&#8230;<\/p><\/div>\n<p data-start=\"1102\" data-end=\"1211\">Here&#8217;s a quick lowdown on what&#8217;s going on in each little bit of airspace&#8230;<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"1102\" data-end=\"1211\">Syria<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"1102\" data-end=\"1211\">Yes, unbelievably we&#8217;re starting this list with Syria! It seems to have quietly become part of the regional routing picture again after years of almost no international overflight traffic.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_30404\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-30404\" class=\"wp-image-30404 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/syria-1024x637.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"637\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/syria-1024x637.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/syria-300x187.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/syria-768x478.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/syria.jpg 1499w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-30404\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">May 27: Lots of little naughties sneaking through!<\/p><\/div>\n<p data-start=\"1102\" data-end=\"1211\"><strong>The OSTT\/Damascus FIR reopened in early 2025 and some regional carriers are now using Syrian airspace again as an alternative to the more restricted Iran\/Iraq option.<\/strong> Most of the traffic currently appears to be Middle East carriers rather than major US or European airlines, which largely continue to avoid the FIR.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1312\" data-end=\"1578\"><strong>The airspace remains high risk.<\/strong> Israeli airstrikes in Syria continue periodically, several countries still prohibit or strongly discourage their operators from entering the OSTT FIR, and ATC capability remains limited. Check <a href=\"https:\/\/safeairspace.net\/syria\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">safeairspace.net<\/a> for more info on the airspace risk side of things.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1580\" data-end=\"1867\">We also spoke to a local Syrian agent (First Aero Services &#8211; seemed very helpful! contact info: <a href=\"mailto:ops@fasaero.com\">ops@fasaero.com<\/a>) about <strong>how overflights currently work here in practice.<\/strong> Operators generally need to apply through a local handling\/permit company, which coordinates with the Syrian authorities and handles nav fee payments. Current charges are reportedly:<\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"1868\" data-end=\"2018\">\n<li data-section-id=\"ykvnyk\" data-start=\"1868\" data-end=\"1915\">EUR 70 overflight permit handling fee per leg<\/li>\n<li data-section-id=\"msdozr\" data-start=\"1916\" data-end=\"1960\">EUR 455 fixed navigation charge per flight<\/li>\n<li data-section-id=\"1bo4fha\" data-start=\"1961\" data-end=\"2018\">extra charges for urgent processing or permit revisions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-start=\"2020\" data-end=\"2198\">At the moment, the Syria routing still looks more like a temporary workaround being used by regional operators than a mainstream replacement for the old central Middle East corridor.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"1213\" data-end=\"1274\">Kuwait<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"1213\" data-end=\"1274\">Kuwait is open again, including OKKK\/Kuwait airport and the Kuwait FIR. Traffic is slowly returning, mostly via Saudi, but there\u2019s still very little sign of airlines using the old central corridor through Kuwait in any major way. Most long haul traffic continues to route further south or north instead.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"1213\" data-end=\"1274\">Iran<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"1213\" data-end=\"1274\">Iran is still operating in what it calls a \u201crecovery period\u201d rather than normal ops. Some overflights above FL285 are possible via specific temporary routes linking Oman\/UAE with Central Asia, the Caucasus and Turkey, but western Iran remains heavily restricted. Several radar systems remain degraded, many western airports are still closed or daytime-only, and pretty much everyone continues avoiding the airspace.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"1604\" data-end=\"1905\">Qatar<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"1604\" data-end=\"1905\">Qatar is open again, including OTHH\/Doha airport, but the FIR is still officially \u201cpartially closed\u201d in the Notams. All flights are limited to specific routes and entry\/exit points, so this is still very much a managed corridor system rather than normal free-flowing Gulf airspace.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"1907\" data-end=\"2272\">UAE<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"1907\" data-end=\"2272\">UAE airspace is getting busier again, but flights are still heavily managed. Several normal routes remain suspended or restricted, with temporary RNAV corridors handling much of the traffic between Saudi and Oman. GPS interference remains a major issue across the airspace.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"2274\" data-end=\"2530\">Bahrain<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"2274\" data-end=\"2530\">Bahrain is open. Flights to OBBI\/Bahrain airport are through fixed entry\/exit points and traffic is gradually resuming rather than back to normal. GPS interference a big issue here too.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"2532\" data-end=\"2893\">Iraq<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"2532\" data-end=\"2893\">Iraq is open for overflights again, but it still doesn\u2019t really bring back the old Europe-Asia corridor because western Iran remains restricted and many operators still consider the ORBB\/Baghdad FIR too high risk. Some airlines are using Iraq, but the main flows still seem to be north via the Caucasus\/Afghanistan or south via Egypt\/Saudi\/Oman.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"2952\" data-end=\"3272\">Saudi Arabia<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"2952\" data-end=\"3272\">Saudi remains open and is still the main southern bypass link. Traffic levels through the OEJD\/Jeddah FIR remain very high, especially between the Gulf and Egypt, with flow measures and tactical routings now a normal part of ops. Opsgroup members are also reporting heavy ATC congestion and blocked transmissions in some sectors (more on that below!)<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"3274\" data-end=\"3556\">Oman<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"3274\" data-end=\"3556\">Oman remains one of the most useful FIRs in the region, especially for the southern bypass. It is open, but still part of the managed corridor system, with flow measures and ongoing GNSS interference reports.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"3558\" data-end=\"3775\">Jordan<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"3558\" data-end=\"3775\">Open and operating normally. In practice, it&#8217;s still not a major transit route for Europe-Asia traffic. Most operators continue to route via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, as they did before the conflict.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"3777\" data-end=\"4093\">Israel<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"3777\" data-end=\"4093\">Israel is open again in a limited way, but ops still aren\u2019t anywhere near normal. Some foreign airlines are returning, but most major US\/European operators are still cautious.<\/p>\n<h4 data-start=\"4094\" data-end=\"4410\">Armenia\/Azerbaijan\/Afghanistan<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"4094\" data-end=\"4410\">Armenia and Azerbaijan remain important parts of the northern bypass, with steady overflight demand. The main issue is still Afghanistan &#8211; the OAKX\/Kabul FIR remains Class G with no normal ATS service, so crews still need to use the published <a href=\"https:\/\/safeairspace.net\/afghanistan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">contingency routes<\/a> and operate with TIBA procedures.<\/p>\n<p><em>So for Europe-Asia traffic or Gulf positioning, the two real options are still the same as we reported before back in March &#8211; north via the Caucasus then Afghanistan, or south via Egypt then Saudi then Oman:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-29925\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Mideast-Routings-March-2026-1024x579.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"579\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Mideast-Routings-March-2026-1024x579.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Mideast-Routings-March-2026-300x170.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Mideast-Routings-March-2026-768x434.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Mideast-Routings-March-2026-1536x868.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Mideast-Routings-March-2026-2048x1157.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/p>\n<h6>Airport Spy reports<\/h6>\n<p>We\u2019ve had a lot of useful Airport Spy reports recently from Opsgroup members operating into several Middle East airports: <strong>OBBI\/Bahrain, OTHH\/Doha, OMSJ\/Sharjah, OMAD\/Abu Dhabi and OEDF\/Dammam.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Big theme across all of them is the <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">scale<\/span> of the GPS jamming\/spoofing<\/strong> currently happening around the region. Several reported complete GPS loss on arrival or departure, and interference continuing well into neighbouring FIRs. ATC seems very used to it now, with lots of runway heading departures and radar vectors being issued.<\/p>\n<p>Reports also mentioned <strong>fuel delays, extra towing\/hangar time, and slower ground handling<\/strong> at some airports. We\u2019ve also had reports of <strong>heavy ATC congestion in the OEJD\/Jeddah FIR<\/strong> as traffic continues concentrating on the southern bypass via Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Opsgroup members can check <a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/dashboard\/airport-spy-home\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Airport Spy<\/a> in their dashboard for the full reports.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_30405\" style=\"width: 1034px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/dashboard\/airport-spy-home\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-30405\" class=\"wp-image-30405 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/airportspy-27may26-1024x387.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"387\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/airportspy-27may26-1024x387.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/airportspy-27may26-300x113.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/airportspy-27may26-768x290.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/airportspy-27may26-1536x581.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/airportspy-27may26-2048x774.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-30405\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Access latest Airport Spy reports here.<\/p><\/div>\n<h6><strong>Recent developments<\/strong><\/h6>\n<h4>May 27 &#8211; EASA updates Middle East CZIB again<\/h4>\n<p>EASA has updated its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.easa.europa.eu\/en\/domains\/air-operations\/czibs\/2026-03-r11\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Middle East Conflict Zone Information Bulletin<\/a> (we&#8217;re now on revision #11!) reflecting the shift from active conflict towards what it describes as a \u201cstate of heightened tension\u201d across the region.<\/p>\n<p>The new version says the ceasefire between the US and Iran is currently holding, and that the overall level of risk has decreased since the peak of the conflict in March and April.<\/p>\n<p><strong>For Iran, Iraq and Lebanon:<\/strong> they recommend operators do not operate in the airspace at any altitude.<\/p>\n<p><strong>For Bahrain, Kuwait, Israel, Jordan, Qatar, Oman, UAE and Saudi Arabia:<\/strong> the advice has softened slightly to \u201cexercise caution\u201d and maintain updated risk assessments etc.<\/p>\n<p>Also, the previous Saudi\/Oman \u201csafe corridor south of a line\u201d wording has now disappeared entirely from the bulletin.<\/p>\n<h4>May 27 &#8211; Most Gulf FIRs reopened<\/h4>\n<p>Most Gulf FIRs have reopened in some form, but things are still far from normal. Most Europe-Asia traffic is still routing south via Egypt-Saudi-Oman\/UAE or north via the Caucasus and Afghanistan, with very little using the old Iran\/Iraq corridor.<\/p>\n<p>GPS jamming\/spoofing is now one of the biggest operational issues in the region. Opsgroup members reported complete GPS loss, and interference extending well into neighbouring FIRs. ATC across the Gulf seems very used to it, with runway heading departures and radar vectors now common.<\/p>\n<h4 data-section-id=\"f3yrox\" data-start=\"1864\" data-end=\"1916\">May &#8211; Ceasefire holding but tensions remain high<\/h4>\n<p data-start=\"1918\" data-end=\"2299\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\">The ceasefire between Iran, Israel and the US does seem to be holding for now, which has allowed most Gulf FIRs to reopen in phases. But this definitely doesn\u2019t mean things are back to normal yet. Military activity is still happening in parts of the region, restrictions are still changing quite often, and several FIRs are still operating under contingency procedures.<\/p>\n<h4>April 24-26 &#8211; Kuwait and Iran begin phased reopening<\/h4>\n<p>Kuwait has reopened its airspace and resumed limited operations after nearly two months of closure, while Iran has restarted some international flights from Tehran and expanded access in the eastern part of its FIR. Both are reopening cautiously and in phases, and neither restores a normal central Middle East routing yet. Most international airlines are still avoiding Iran, with only limited use of Iraq airspace.<\/p>\n<h4>April 23 &#8211; Opsgroup member reports on OEJD\/Jeddah FIR congestion<\/h4>\n<p>OPSGROUP members report comms congestion in the southeastern sector of the Jeddah FIR (towards the Muscat boundary, up to ITRUX). Frequencies are saturated with blocked transmissions and delayed check-ins, with ATC sometimes instructing extended \u201cstandby\u201d and calling aircraft individually. Guard (121.5) has occasionally been used to pass frequency changes. Crews report being held around FL300-330 until handoff. This reflects the increased traffic using the southern bypass route and may cause delays in the area.<\/p>\n<p>OPSGROUP members can check <a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/dashboard\/airport-spy-home\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Airport Spy<\/a> for more info.<\/p>\n<h4>April 21 &#8211; Iran reopens east part of Tehran FIR<\/h4>\n<p>Iran has reopened the east part of Tehran FIR to overflights above FL285 under recovery-period procedures, while the west part remains closed. This is the biggest airspace change since our last update, but it does not restore a normal central corridor.<\/p>\n<h4>April 20-22 &#8211; Qatar and Bahrain move further into controlled reopening<\/h4>\n<p>Qatar\u2019s current Notams now say OTHH is available to all airlines via dedicated corridor entry and exit points, while Bahrain remains open with prior approval only and fixed OBBI entry and exit points. Both are more usable than they were in early April, but neither is back to normal hub operations.<\/p>\n<h4>March 30 &#8211; Missile intercepted over Turkey<\/h4>\n<p>Another Iranian ballistic missile was intercepted over southern Turkey, with debris reported near the Syrian border. Turkish airspace remains open with no operational impact, but the incident again shows how far west some of the missile activity is extending.<\/p>\n<h4>March 24-30 &#8211; UAE short-notice closures continue<\/h4>\n<p>The UAE continued to briefly close its airspace during new missile and drone threats, reopening shortly afterwards. This reinforced the risk of sudden disruption even when the FIR was technically open.<\/p>\n<h4>March 24 &#8211; OKKK\/Kuwait airport fuel tank hit<\/h4>\n<p>A drone strike hit a fuel storage tank at OKKK\/Kuwait, causing a fire. No casualties were reported, but this was another direct strike on airport infrastructure and highlighted the ongoing risk to ATC and fuel systems.<\/p>\n<h4>March 17 &#8211; UAE airspace closure<\/h4>\n<p>The UAE briefly closed its entire airspace overnight on March 16-17 as an \u201cexceptional precautionary measure\u201d during new missile and drone threats.<\/p>\n<p>It lasted about two hours before reopening, but caused fresh disruption to already limited ops into OMDB\/Dubai and OMDW\/Al Maktoum.<\/p>\n<p>This came just one day after the drone strike near OMDB, and showed how quickly the situation can change &#8211; even FIRs that are technically open can shut with little or no warning.<\/p>\n<h4>March 16 &#8211; LLBG\/Tel Aviv BizAv ban appears to ease<\/h4>\n<p>Earlier this week we reported that BizAv flights were not being approved at LLBG\/Tel Aviv, based on guidance from the Israeli CAA and multiple Opsgroup member reports. That restriction did not appear in the Notams at the time.<\/p>\n<p>A local handler at QAS Executive Aviation (<a href=\"mailto:pvt@qasisrael.co.il\">pvt@qasisrael.co.il<\/a>) later advised that BizAv operators could again apply for PPR approval through the airport ops center.\u00a0Slots remained extremely limited and priority was still being given to emergency and state flights, so approvals could be difficult to obtain. Check with your handler before planning any BizAv ops to LLBG.<\/p>\n<h4>March 16 &#8211; OMDB\/Dubai drone strike halts flights<\/h4>\n<p>A drone strike hit a fuel storage tank near OMDB\/Dubai, causing a large fire and forcing a temporary suspension of operations. At least 65 flights diverted to airports across the region, including OMDW\/Al Maktoum, while others held or turned back as emergency services dealt with the blaze.<\/p>\n<h4>March 14 &#8211; Drones strike OKKK\/Kuwait airport radar<\/h4>\n<p>Kuwait authorities reported that multiple drones targeted OKKK\/Kuwait airport, damaging part of the airport\u2019s radar system. No casualties were reported, but the incident highlighted the potential for ATC capability to be degraded if radar infrastructure is damaged.<\/p>\n<h4>March 11 &#8211; Opsgroup member reports<\/h4>\n<p><strong>OMDW\/Al Maktoum turn:<\/strong> One member reported a recent turn at OMDW\/Al Maktoum with generally smooth operations despite the regional situation. Arriving from the north, the only operational issue was GPS jamming beginning near Riyadh. The airport itself was quiet and well organised. Departure was delayed by about five minutes due to military activity. The permit process was more involved than usual, requiring a risk assessment before approval as part of the current UAE corridor procedures (see <a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/middle-east-airspace-current-operational-picture\/#:~:text=A%20local%20handler%20has,risk%20assessment%20here.\">this section<\/a> below for more info).<\/p>\n<p><strong>OERK\/Riyadh rescue flight:<\/strong> Another member operating a Part 121 rescue flight reported smooth ops on a routing Germany-Riyadh-Germany. The permit process and UAE GCAA No Objection Certificate were issued without problems. Ground handling at OERK\/Riyadh was efficient, with fuel uplift starting immediately on arrival and a two-hour ground time. The western routing via Saudi-Egypt-Greece worked without issues. They also reported that insurance applied a premium for the trip, and the flight required a Safety Risk Analysis including FAA considerations.<\/p>\n<h4>March 7 &#8211; OMDB\/Dubai drone incident<\/h4>\n<p>OMDB\/Dubai Airport briefly suspended operations on March 7 after a drone struck near Terminal 3, causing minor damage and smoke near the terminal area. Flights were halted while authorities checked the airport and several arrivals aborted or held. Operations resumed later the same day, though delays continued across the airport.<\/p>\n<h4>March 6 &#8211; Israel<\/h4>\n<p>Ops at LLBG\/Tel Aviv were briefly disrupted when an El Al repatriation flight had to abort its landing after missile sirens sounded across central Israel during an Iranian attack wave. The aircraft entered a holding pattern before returning for a second approach once the alert was lifted.<\/p>\n<h4>March 6 &#8211; OOMS\/Muscat \u201cscheduled flights only\u201d Notam<\/h4>\n<p>Some media reports said Muscat was restricting BizAv flights due to congestion from evacuation traffic. A Notam appeared to support this: OOMS airport accepts scheduled flights only, all diversion flights subject to prior approval. However, a local handler at Jetex OOMS advised that normal BizAv operations were continuing, and operators should not expect any practical impact from this Notam for now. Contact them at: <a href=\"mailto:fbo-mct@jetex.com\">fbo-mct@jetex.com<\/a> for more info.<\/p>\n<h4>March 6 &#8211; UAE airports operating limited flights<\/h4>\n<p>Airlines started operating more flights from UAE airports using the restricted corridor system, though capacity remained well below normal levels.<\/p>\n<p>A local handler advised that to use the repatriation corridors into UAE airports, operators first had to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the GCAA Foreign Operators Affairs Department (FOA). Operators reportedly submitted a short risk assessment to <a href=\"mailto:foa@gcaa.gov.ae\">foa@gcaa.gov.ae<\/a>, after which a NOC was issued. This then had to be provided to the handler for the landing permit request. Response times were typically less than 60 mins, and a single NOC could cover multiple flights for the same aircraft during the recovery period. You can find an example of a completed risk assessment <a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Repatriation-Flights-Foreign-Operators.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-29883\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UAE-6MAR26-1024x619.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"619\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UAE-6MAR26-1024x619.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UAE-6MAR26-300x181.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UAE-6MAR26-768x464.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UAE-6MAR26-1536x928.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UAE-6MAR26.jpg 1800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/p>\n<h4>March 6 &#8211; Oman becoming a staging point<\/h4>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flightradar24.com\/blog\/live\/israel-launches-pre-emptive-strikes-on-iran-airspace-closures-going-into-place\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Flightradar24<\/a> reported that OOMM\/Muscat was becoming a staging point for evacuation and repositioning flights. Airline and private aircraft were using the airport to position for repatriation flights, as it sits just outside the most restricted Gulf airspace while still providing access to the southern bypass route via Saudi Arabia and Egypt.<\/p>\n<h4>March 5 &#8211; Azerbaijan drone strike<\/h4>\n<p>Iranian drones crossed the Iran-Azerbaijan border early on March 5 and one struck the terminal building at UBBN\/Nakhchivan airport. Damage appeared limited to the terminal area with no confirmed runway impact. This was the first time the current Iran conflict spilled into the Caucasus, close to the Armenia-Azerbaijan overflight corridor used by traffic avoiding the Middle East airspace closures. No impact was reported to UBBB\/Baku airport or the main overflight flows.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-29868\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UBBN-map-5MAR26-1024x624.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"624\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UBBN-map-5MAR26-1024x624.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UBBN-map-5MAR26-300x183.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UBBN-map-5MAR26-768x468.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UBBN-map-5MAR26-1536x936.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/UBBN-map-5MAR26.jpg 1732w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/p>\n<h4>March 4 &#8211; Missile interception over Turkey<\/h4>\n<p>On March 4, a ballistic missile launched from Iran travelled west and was intercepted over southern Turkey by NATO air defence systems. Debris was reported to have fallen in the Hatay region near the Syrian border. Turkish airspace remained open and there was no operational impact reported, but the incident highlighted how far west some of the missile activity associated with the conflict was extending.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-29869\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LTDA-map-5MAR26-1024x624.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"624\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LTDA-map-5MAR26-1024x624.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LTDA-map-5MAR26-300x183.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LTDA-map-5MAR26-768x468.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LTDA-map-5MAR26-1536x936.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LTDA-map-5MAR26.jpg 1732w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/p>\n<h4>March 3 &#8211; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia<\/h4>\n<p>Iranian drones struck the US Embassy area during overnight attacks on Saudi Arabia. Damage was reported in the area, though Saudi air defences intercepted several other drones targeting the city.<\/p>\n<h4>March 1-2 &#8211; Cyprus<\/h4>\n<p>A drone strike caused minor damage at RAF Akrotiri, a major UK airbase used for regional military operations. Nearby LCPH\/Paphos airport was briefly evacuated after radar detected a potential aerial threat approaching the island.<\/p>\n<h4>Since Feb 28 &#8211; Israel and Iran<\/h4>\n<p>US and Israeli strikes on Iranian military targets triggered ongoing Iranian missile and drone retaliation across Israel and several Gulf states. Multiple waves of attacks targeted military bases and infrastructure across the region, leading to widespread airspace closures and disruption to normal Middle East flight routes.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>If you have operated in the region recently and could <strong>share your experience<\/strong>, send us an anonymous <a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/spyreport\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Airport Spy report<\/a> or email us at <a href=\"mailto:team@ops.group\">team@ops.group<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"3904\" data-end=\"4275\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/spyreport\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-15139 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Airport-Spy-1024x342.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Airport-Spy-1024x342.png 1024w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Airport-Spy-300x100.png 300w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Airport-Spy-768x257.png 768w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Airport-Spy-1536x513.png 1536w, https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Airport-Spy.png 1783w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"342\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key Points &#8211; May 27 update Most Gulf FIRs are now open again, but ops&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":29850,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[34,451,1230],"class_list":{"0":"post-29827","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-briefings","8":"tag-iran","9":"tag-israel","10":"tag-middle-east"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29827","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29827"}],"version-history":[{"count":101,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29827\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30411,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29827\/revisions\/30411"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29850"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}