{"id":14150,"date":"2021-07-19T00:01:06","date_gmt":"2021-07-19T04:01:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/?p=14150"},"modified":"2021-07-22T06:20:27","modified_gmt":"2021-07-22T10:20:27","slug":"simthing-to-think-about","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ops.group\/blog\/simthing-to-think-about\/","title":{"rendered":"Simthing to Think About"},"content":{"rendered":"

What are you practicing with your crew in the sim nowadays? An engine failure on take-off? A few technical malfunctions? An assessment of their competencies and then send them on their way for another year?<\/p>\n

Well, we thought we might suggest a slightly different sim scenario<\/strong> for you to think about…<\/p>\n

What else should you be throwing at your crew?<\/h4>\n

There have been a bunch of recommendations out from the authorities suggesting crew swot up on their Unreliable Speed procedures<\/a> because the number of these occurring have increased a lot recently. Something to do with aircraft coming out of long term storage with bugs nesting in their probes…<\/p>\n

However, an ‘Oracle of the NAT’<\/strong> recently pointed out to us that many crew have not been doing anywhere near as many NAT routings, which means their NAT procedures probably need as much attention as their airplane\u2019s pitot ports do.<\/p>\n

What are we talking?<\/h4>\n

Incorrectly flown contingency procedures<\/strong> (not to do with weather) were one of the top reasons for lateral deviation events in the NAT in 2020.<\/a> Now it was admittedly only 6% but that is still one of the Top Ten mess ups, and a mess up easily prevented with practice.<\/p>\n

There were also a few incorrectly flown weather deviations.<\/strong> These procedures are not hard to do, but they do need thinking about once in while (preferably before you\u2019re actually up there needing to know them) which is why the sim suggestion was presumably made.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Left, right, up, down. Quick, whaddya do? (Credit: Ramon Stalenhoef)<\/p><\/div>\n

Now, you could just email everyone a reminder of how to do it. A bit of text and a diagram. But a handier way to recap (and in a way that properly puts the info into their heads) would be to really put crew up there<\/strong>, throw some \u201cfun\u201d failures at them, and let them practice “for real” in the sim.<\/p>\n

So, what\u2019s the recommendation?<\/h4>\n

Well, we ain\u2019t no trainers, but between us we have seen a few sims ourselves in our time. So here is what we suggest you might want to throw into a sim session if you think your crew could do with a refresher…<\/p>\n

\"\"

FFS for Full Flight Sim. Not for what all pilots think when they see ‘SIM Check’ on the roster.<\/p><\/div>\n

The Opsgroup Ops on the NAT Sim Scenario Storyline Suggestion.<\/h4>\n

Let\u2019s set the scene. It is the middle of the night, the flight is somewhere over the North Atlantic, dark, lonely and quiet, when\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

KABOOM!\u00a0<\/strong>Rapid decompression.<\/p>\n

This throws in a nice bit of startle factor<\/a> (which is also something pilots need practice in dealing with.)<\/p>\n

Now those contingencies will be put to the test – how much to turn, how much to offset, what else do they need to do and say?<\/strong><\/p>\n

There is also that good old Situational Awareness thing to look at as well.<\/p>\n

Do they, for example, identify where other traffic<\/strong> is, think about the NAT tracks<\/strong> and their proximity to the next parallel one, and think about whether they were SLOP<\/strong>ing already or not?<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s get really mean.<\/h4>\n

A big thing to consider with NAT flights is just how remote and far from land you often are. So Big Picture proactive planning<\/strong> is a good habit to get into.<\/p>\n

This means setting up for emergency diversions<\/strong> before you find yourself suddenly having to do one. An awareness of where the closest and most suitable spot for a landing is in advance\u00a0<\/em>might really save the day. Or at least a few panicked minutes of trying to work it out.<\/p>\n

This is important anywhere<\/strong>, but particularly so when flying in the NAT because something like a rapid decompression<\/strong> is going to have you zooming down to FL95.<\/p>\n

Fuel<\/strong> can become a big problemo quickly, but so can separation to other traffic<\/strong> if you start diving down and crossing tracks.<\/p>\n

\"\"

The fun seat.<\/p><\/div>\n

Where we would do it.<\/h4>\n

We would be mean trainers. The ones that people always call sick for. Power-crazed with the fun of coming up with mean scenarios to inflict on our poor pilots!<\/p>\n

We would definitely make sure it was remote, with a massive headwind making the \u201cnearest\u201d in distance the furthest in time.<\/strong> We would probably throw in some bad weather<\/strong> at one to see if the crew fly themselves into a corner, and maybe an HF blackout<\/strong> or ATC Zero<\/strong> just to make those radio procedures a bit more fun.<\/p>\n

Then we would sit back and enjoy watching it unfold while rubbing our hands together gleefully.<\/p>\n

You might be nicer than us though.<\/h4>\n

If you are then you could always share the following with your crew before the sim session:<\/p>\n